PROJECT DATA
Category
Safety & Operations
Lead
Mærsk Mc-Kinney Møller Center for Zero Carbon Shipping
Status: Ongoing

Ammonia Safety

Published — October 21, 2024

Decarbonization of the shipping industry will require widespread uptake of alternative fuels. Ammonia has been identified as a promising alternative shipping fuel in the mid to long term, and development of ammonia-fueled marine engines and ship designs is ongoing. However, the characteristics of ammonia, including its toxicity and gaseous nature, mean that its implementation as a marine fuel will require much more than technical readiness: the industry will also need a strong focus on safety, human factors, and new training requirements relating to ammonia as a fuel.

Below, you can find an overview of ongoing work at the Mærsk-McKinney Møller Center for Zero Carbon Shipping (MMMCZCS) on the topic of ammonia safety.

Human Factors - Crew Safety

The implementation of alternatives to conventional fossil-based fuels is key to the decarbonization of the global shipping industry. Ammonia is part of the future maritime fuel mix, as it can be combusted with almost no carbon dioxide emissions. However, using ammonia as a shipping fuel involves safety hazards: primarily toxicity, but also onboard fires and explosions. Therefore, it is crucial to understand these risks and the safeguards that can be implemented to mitigate them.

At MMMCZCS, we have pioneered an innovative multi-disciplinary approach to assess and address the ammonia-related onboard safety risks to a ship’s crew. This project is a collaboration with the Lloyd’s Register Maritime Decarbonization Hub (MDH), with contributions from other partners.

The 2023 report ''Recommendations for Design and Operation of Ammonia-Fueled Vessels Based on Multi-disciplinary Risk Analysis'' outlines the results of this project.

Bunkering Guidelines

There are several initiatives in the industry developing bunkering standards for ammonia. However, lack of alignment of knowledge carries a risk of increased complexity and delays in implementation, further leading to delays in uptake of ammonia as a marine fuel.

However, lack of coordination among these work streams and lack of alignment of knowledge creates a risk that competing standards may be developed. This would lead to an increase in complexity and potential bunkering interface cost, as well as a delay in the implementation of ammonia as maritime fuel.

On this topic, MMMCZCS has contributed to bunkering guidelines developed by SGMF report “Ammonia as a Marine Fuel” – An Introduction to the increase in studies on ammonia-fueled vessel related projects and the collaboration between stakeholders in the industry to further aid the use of ammonia as a marine fuel.

Perceptions of ammonia as a marine fuel

Perceptions of ammonia as a marine fuel

To map maritime industry perceptions of ammonia as a marine fuel, MMMCZCS undertook a survey of over 2,000 respondents across the maritime community to better understand their perceptions, concerns, and requests relating to ammonia as a marine fuel. The survey reached respondents covering a range of different ages, positions, vessel segments, and level of experience with gaseous fuels or ammonia as cargo. Over half (58.6%) of the total respondents agreed that they would be willing to sail on or work with ammonia-fueled vessels, while 24% were unsure and 12% reported that they would not be willing. More specifically, 59% of seafarers and 57% of ashore personnel who responded to the survey agreed that they would be willing to work with ammonia.

While more than half of the respondents were willing to sail on or work with ammonia-fueled vessels, these respondents nevertheless raised some specific concerns, especially regarding training and safety.

Technical Solutions

To guide the regulatory process around developing interim guidelines of ammonia as a fuel, the MMMCZCS mapped the technical solutions available to mitigate risks of handling ammonia onboard leading to inherently safer ship designs.

Demonstrator Projects

MMMCZCS is involved in a number of projects leading to ammonia trials, including:

  • MAGPIE
    The project consists of several individual tasks the center has committed to deliver in the EU funded MAGPIE project led by the Port of Rotterdam (PoR). The overall project management responsibility is managed by PoR and it consists of approximately 50 consortium members from across the EU. Read more about the project MAGPIE here.

  • Singapore Ammonia Bunkering feasibility study
    Technical and commercial feasibility study using preliminary design and subsequent maturing of the feasibility towards supply chain FID’s including the ordering of ammonia bunkers and bunkering standards. Read more about the project SABRE: Singapore Ammonia Bunkering feasibility study here.

  • Savannah Ammonia Bunkering feasibility study
    Expansion of the work and knowledge from the Singapore based ammonia project “SABRE”. MMMCZCS is part of a consortium of partners looking to develop bunkering infrastructure for ammonia on the US east coast.